The Shield of Progressive Virtue

Luckily for wrongdoers, progressive society has a default attitude of forgiveness toward anyone who publicly avows progressive views. It is believed that they must have worldlove and therefore would be highly unlikely to commit traditionally evil acts.

This shield of progressive virtue even extends to foreign terrorists. They need not express progressive views or display worldlove; merely having the same enemies as progressives is sufficient. For instance, at a 2002 Socialist Scholars Conference, a large crowd applauded an Egyptian novelist’s defense of a young Palestinian woman’s recent suicide/murder.   As David Horowitz writes in Unholy Alliance, even the socialist writer who witnessed this event was surprised that such a pathological movement was embraced by the progressive utopians attending the conference.  But both the radical Islamist and the devout progressive believe in a coming utopia. The radical Islamist’s faith compels him to attempt to dominate all non-believing societies in order to institute sharia for Allah; the socialist’s faith compels him to eliminate private property through state power, including violence, and bring on the millennium.  Newthinkers don’t take radical Islam’s pathology seriously because they think that religion itself is just an expression of the wretchedness caused by capitalist oppression.*

[Progressives] see Islamists through the filter of their own worldview’s unconscious beliefs. They note their common enemies and incorrectly infer that Islamists are therefore progressively virtuous.

Just as traditional Americans do not understand or often even recognize newthink, progressives do not understand or often even recognize Islamism. They see Islamists through the filter of their own worldview’s unconscious beliefs. They note their common enemies and incorrectly infer that Islamists are therefore progressively virtuous. As for the Islamists, they see the manifestations of worldlove among their enemies as weakness and an opening for attack.

* David Horowitz, Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left, (Regnery Publishing, 2004), p. 129.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Secular Saints: The Public Display of Progressive Virtue Under Newthink

In progressive society, social advantages adhere to those who seem to possess worldlove. They gain popularity; they are shielded by the fierce protectiveness of other newthinkers; they are granted a default attitude of forgiveness for any transgressions; they walk in the glow of secular sainthood. These secular saints’ great progressive piety is derived not from actions but from the public display of their politically-correct, progressively-virtuous thoughts, and their worldlove.

English: Al Gore's Hearing on Global Warming

English: Al Gore’s Hearing on Global Warming (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Politicians, to whom popularity is always important, strive for it under newthink through the appearance of progressive virtue. Aging celebrities, anxious to hang on to their adoring public, often publicly exhibit worldlove late in their careers. Large corporations spend millions in advertising dollars seeking to wrap themselves in the glowing mantle of PV. The environmental movement is in large part a corporate public relations effort to achieve progressive virtue. This isn’t always just conscious cynicism; people continuously and unconsciously seek the appearance of virtue as it exists within their worldview, whether it be goodness under Americanism or progressive virtue under newthink.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Progressive Empathy

As Dennis Prager often says, empathy trumps standards in progressive society. Devout progressives are motivated by their worldlove. (Worldlove is a bundle of emotions which are typically dominant in progressives, including sensitivity, empathy, righteousness and love.) Thus, for example, it is considered progressively virtuous – sensitive and loving – to accommodate foreign speakers with their native language in the public square rather than insist that all Americans speak a common tongue. That those foreigners are then disadvantaged throughout their lifetimes by their lack of fluency in standard English is irrelevant to the empathic newthinkers.

Another example: it is more progressively virtuous to pass failing students to the next grade than to insist that they be able to meet the academic standards necessary for promotion. That those students are then unable to cope with the even more stringent standards of higher classes and are primed to fail throughout their lives is, again, not relevant to the sensitive and loving newthinkers.

…worldlove initially seems all warm and fuzzy to those in its embrace. But the lucky recipients of that hug would be better off snuggling with a boa constrictor. When standards are replaced by worldlove, the results are almost universally disastrous.

Progressives filled with worldlove are able to bask in their own progressive virtue. And worldlove initially seems all warm and fuzzy to those in its embrace. But the lucky recipients of that hug would be better off snuggling with a boa constrictor. When standards are replaced by worldlove, the results are almost universally disastrous.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Worldlove

Progressives tend to believe that sensitivity, empathy, righteousness and love are extremely important and should be the core of a progressive society.

The unconscious logic supporting this belief is as follows, starting from the “Human beings are inherently and transcendentally noble” branch of the newthink worldview tree:
• Human beings are inherently and transcendentally noble.
• Our motives are inherently noble.
• We are progressively virtuous.
• Progressive virtue is supremely important.
• Sensitivity, empathy, righteousness and love are extremely important and should be the core of a progressive society.

 

Here’s a new definition:

worldlove n : a bundle of emotions which are typically dominant in progressives, including sensitivity, empathy, righteousness and love

Peace, Love & Happiness

Peace, Love & Happiness (Photo credit: las – initially)

It’s not coincidental that this sensitive and loving righteousness that I call worldlove is emblematic of the feelings of a good mother. The prototypical emotional package of mothers has been sublimated and emerges as the emotional core of progressives, while the object of this sensitive and righteous love is no longer a child, but society as a whole. This is another example of an evolutionary micro-feminine drive – in this case, motherly love – transported into the macro world.

The unconscious logic branching out of this belief is:

• One must never hurt the feelings of the progressively virtuous.

 

Worldlove is nurtured by newthinkers like a precious and fragile seedling. In truth, it is the seedling of the newthink worldview tree in each individual progressive. Progressives are hypersensitive about the effect of words and actions on other progressives with worldlove.

…political correctness, instead of being understood as a new moral code, is commonly thought of as merely a hypersensitivity to the negative effects of words…

This trait is so conspicuous that political correctness, instead of being understood as a new moral code, is commonly thought of as merely a hypersensitivity to the negative effects of words – so much so that the dictionary definition of political correctness is “the avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.”*

* The New Oxford American Dictionary, (Oxford University Press, 2001).

Enhanced by Zemanta